ABA is a behaviour modification method for the ‘treatment’ of autism. It is used particularly with autistic children who struggle with communication and self-regulation. ABA is often said to be ‘evidence-based’, in spite of there being little evidence of support for ABA from the community it purports to serve. This article, written for a South African audience, provides an introduction to the writing of non-speaking autistics on their ABA experiences.

ABA is not supported by the majority of autistic people, as it violates the UN Convention on the Rights of People With Disabilities.

Introduction

The ‘gold standard in autism treatment’ is a behaviour modification method called Applied Behavioural Analysis, or ABA. ABA assumes that ‘severely autistic’ people are ‘developmentally delayed’, and that they lack the motivation or intelligence (or both) to behave ‘normally’. To motivate autists to change their behaviour, and to teach them things they are assumed to not know, therapists called Applied Behavioural Analysts and Behaviour Technicians drill children for hours per day using rewards and withholding of rewards, and in some cases through more explicit punishment (called ‘aversives’). ABA is also used to teach life-skills (like brushing teeth).

Some organisations, such as the Neurodiversity Centre in Paarl, partner with or refer children to ABA organisations whilst not favouring ABA as the best fit for all autistic people. Others, including Els for Autism, focus primarily on ABA, and emphasise the need for starting as early as possible. AIMS Global does not use ABA, but requires that its therapists be trained in ABA, and recruits them accordingly. They also make it clear to clients that their therapists are ABA-trained. Incredible Minds Adaptive Learning Centre in Durban will not collaborate with anyone who does ABA.

Star Academy is one of the most expensive ABA schools in South Africa. Therapists at Star are trained according to the CARD model of ABA. To better understand ABA, Managing Director Ilana Gerschlowitz recommends searching the Internet for information on Ivar Lovaas, one of the ‘fathers’ of ABA.

Ivar Lovaas and the origins of ABA

ABA developed from B. F. Skinner’s operant conditioning model for animal training. Lovaas did not consider autistic children to be people until they had undergone his ‘therapy’ to ‘build a person’. His treatment included electric shocks as punishment for behaving autistically. Although he later modified his approach, electric shocks are used as punishment at the Judge Rotenberg Center in the USA as part of ABA to this day. ASAN (an autistic-led organisation), ADAPT and other disability rights organisations protest against this abuse in an effort to have it stopped.

The following articles provide a glimpse into Lovaas’ work. They come with a trigger warning, as they provide accounts of torture and dehumanisation:

Most modern ABA relies on showing kindness in exchange for the desired behaviour, and ignoring a disabled child’s distress signals, or paying attention to them only if they are expressed in the ways prescribed by the therapist. Children learn that expressing their feelings in autistic ways is unacceptable, and will not be rewarded. Some CARD-trained ABA therapists will not allow non-speaking children to use the signs or symbols for ‘no’ or ‘stop’, so that they cannot object to anything done to them.

ABA, law and government

ABA was originally developed to turn homosexual people into heterosexuals. In some places it is no longer legal to use ABA for this purpose. However, it has not yet been banned for use against autistic people. In some countries, such as the USA, the government pays for children to undergo ABA. In the USA alone, the ABA industry rakes in approximately 17 billion dollars per year, and is gearing up to expand even further with the support of Autism Speaks.

Needless to say, ABA is not supported by the majority of autistic people, as it violates the UN Convention on the Rights of People With Disabilities. Autistic human rights activist Ruti Regan explains how this makes ABA, even in its ‘gentle’ forms, different from typical parenting.

A few people voluntarily undergo ABA to acquire new habits, but compared to the numbers who undergo ABA as forced compliance, this is rare.

Non-speaking autistics’ experiences of ABA

Emerging evidence shows that apraxia is the primary reason why many autistic people either don’t speak at all, or do not speak reliably or effectively.

Autistic people who have apraxia struggle with purposeful movement. This means that they will struggle to execute even the babyish tasks given to them by Applied Behavioural Analysts, while those autists who have fewer movement problems may become more adept at faking normal and developing the responses which parents and therapists deem necessary.

While there are many accounts of the traumatic effects of ABA written by autistic people who speak well, the present article features only the writing of non-speaking autistics. Their words are significant, because the more disabled and apraxic the individual, the more likely they are to be targeted with ABA.


40 hours a week of touching flashcards won’t help a toddler who may have an inability to focus visually, or hear speech distinctly in a sea of sounds, or be able to move the way he wants, to gain the sensory control or muscle control he needs to be able to communicate or show his intelligence. That’s because ABA believes autism is a severe learning disability that is treated by drills, rewards and baby talk. This makes recognition of the motor challenges nearly impossible because all the  data from the child’s success in performing the drills is interpreted as a measure of how much the child understands speech, and not of whether the child can get his body to move correctly. Therefore if a child is told to jump and he doesn’t jump because he can’t get his body to move at that moment in that way, his failure is chalked up to a lack of understanding the word ‘jump’ even if he damn-well understands the word ‘jump’ and everything else. To interpret data solely based on the  belief that a person’s actions are an accurate reflection of their comprehension of speech, leaves out the possibility of helping this motor trapped person address his real needs.

Ido Kedar


As someone who has had every sort of treatment thrown at them, I say don’t do any of these things! No child should be in 40 hours of therapy like I was. The most effective thing my parents did was to join me in cutting paper and the things I loved to do. It was the only way I knew to connect with the outside world. All the rest of it was irrelevant. Understanding that your child experiences the world very differently from you is the first step towards acceptance.

Sometimes I wonder what my childhood would have been like had I just been allowed to be able to do my own thing. Stopping my behaviors was the wrong way to go. Fortunately, I’m a pretty patient guy.

Niko Boskovic


Some recommend up to 40 hours per week of this “therapy”, which consists of commands an Autistic child must follow to exhaustion, responses an Autistic child must give “correctly”, even if the answers don’t match the child’s feelings or preferences, and the repression of movements that Autistics use to regulate their own bodies.

Besides this extreme regimen, the “experts” insist that parents use the same tactics at home.

So, parents pay a lot of money to people who don’t allow Autistics to experience growth, and the world, the Autistic way. They pay for abuse.

Parents are made to feel guilty and encouraged to force their children into molds that were not made for them.

Autistic children are not allowed to be themselves, being forced instead, to learn how to pretend, never learning self-determination, never allowed to have an independent thought.

Not surprisingly, the majority of ABA proponents are making a lot of money by stealing the childhood of Autistic children. 40 hours/week of drills, plus homework, the children don’t experience their own personal development.

This is considered abuse, if done to non-autistics. And then we have to hear that WE cost too much money.

Wrong: ABA therapists cost too much money. Take them out of our lives, let Autistic children be children. Let Autistics develop in our own time, learning about ourselves, learning self-determination.

I can hear the apologists:

“My ABA is not like that.”

If you bill ABA prices, if you want to change how an Autistic acts, reacts, or interacts with the world, and your ideal model is a neurotypical type of behavior, your ABA is as bad as I described it.

“My child loves it.”

How would you know, if she is not allowed to have her own thoughts? The word “no”, or refusal to comply with the therapist’s commands, are not allowed.

Another reason is that children do learn to fake in order to please. That is, after all, what ABA defines as success: obedient pleasers. It is not enjoyment, pleasant or something to look forward to.

Yes, some children might show enjoyment in some moments, but I did too, when I got my cookie for looking at the therapist. I wanted that cookie, I briefly looked at her, I got my wish. You could say that, at that moment, I “loved it”.

See also: Appearing to enjoy behavior modification is not meaningful 

“It is not as bad as you think.”

Yes it is. Putting children through unending hours of training, not allowing them to be who they are, forcing an experience of the world we Autistics can never naturally have, and stating how not good enough we are to everyone else is pretty bad. It is abusive. It is disrespectful.

“Autistic children need to learn certain skills.”

All children do. Respectful approaches don’t cause trauma and value our essence. It does not imply we are broken.

All children make mistakes and they have a chance to learn, they are kindly guided and taught. But to ABA proponents, Autistic children (and Autistic adults) are not allowed to err, or they are forever labeled a failure, or abused until they “get it right”.

I had some ABA when I was young, and I “flunked”. I want to say, I am proud of this “F” in my life.

Of course, the “experts” explanation for having failed to make me into a “tidy”, “appropriate”, “good girl”, obedient and compliant Autistic was my severe impairment, my extreme low IQ, my inability to learn or, as Lovaas would probably have said (and something a doctor actually said), my lack of human dignity.

I prefer my own assessment: if you want something from me, if you want me to do something, respect who I am, respect my way of doing things, listen to me and allow me to disagree and to find my own way.

ABA rejects all of this and that’s why I failed it.

I am, though, a very disabled Autistic who needs a lot of support, but who is completely independent in what I believe matters most: my thinking, my ideas, my decisions, my identity.

I am completely distinguishable from my peers, and proudly so.

I am free to say “no” when I see fit. And I do.

Amy Sequenzia


As an autistic boy, I want you to know I am happy. My autistic neurology makes me think very differently than most people. I can sense the world keenly, making me a very observant person. People make wrong assumptions about people who don’t act like a typical person. Making assumptions about something as important as your child is dangerous if you make the wrong conclusions. I have lived the consequences of my parents’ wrong assumptions. Being thought as retarded and in need of remedial education assigned me to many years of ABA and useless therapies based on neurotypical assumptions of autism. Man assumes many things they don’t really know. The best way to know someone is to hear from them personally. The only way to hear from me has been through RPM (Rapid Prompting Method). I think most autistic people can make use of assistive means to communicate. Parents should look into learning more communication methods. Body awareness programs would also help a lot. My parents have done a lot of therapies. Making life as normal as possible and helping us to communicate is what makes the biggest difference in our lives. Please teach us interesting things. Don’t just address the things you want to fix. Accept us the same way you want to be accepted yourself. Mainly, maintain an attitude of love and patience towards us. Making us feel loved is an essential part of helping us meet the challenges of living in this world.

Philip Reyes


I was treated with mostly kindness, but the therapists could not see beyond their training. I learn quickly, but am not able to reply with words that sound right to another.

Worry becomes everyone’s focus.

Real learning happens when no one notices.

The goals waste away.

Tender feelings do not hurt, but are not helpful because they cannot soothe wounds of being constantly underestimated.

Emma Zurcher-Long


A final thought

The first non-speaking author quoted above, Ido Kedar, learned to communicate his throughts via a letterboard, as did a number of the others quoted here. The letterboard is held in position by a parent, therapist or aide. In the early stages of learning, there may be a lot of prompting to develop accuracy of movement, hence the name Rapid Prompting Method. Some newer methods, such as Spelling to Communicate, also make use of letterboards. Prompts fade as the autistic client perfects their skill.

Ido has been the victim of scathing attacks by promotors of ABA. One of them claimed that his words were not his own, but that he was trained like a horse to merely appear clever.

Ido realised that these invalidations would continue to plague him unless he developed the ability to type independently, which he eventually did with the help of a therapist.

To this day, disabled people like Ido are silenced by powerful people in the multi-billion dollar ‘behavioural health industry’ (as investors call it) and by well-meaning therapists, parents and teachers who fall for ABA and become its foot-soldiers. Many never imagine that non-speaking autistic people may have something to say, and prize the few nonsensical words that emit from their mouths whilst refusing to believe that something very different and far richer lies within.

Human dignity does not reside in the ability to make eye contact, to move fluidly, to speak, or to live alone.

Human dignity most certainly does not reside in speaking over non-speakers in defense of ABA.